Category: Technology

  • Australia Probes Apple, Microsoft, Adobe Over High Prices

    Australian officials are looking into whether Apple, Microsoft, and Adobe charge too much for their products in the region.

    Australian officials are looking into whether Apple, Microsoft, and Adobe charge too much for their products in the region.

    The committee for infrastructure and communications within Australia’s House of Representatives will hold a hearing on Friday, March 22 to examine the issue. In a news release, the committee said it has issued summonses to the three tech firms to appear at that hearing.

    “The Committee has been examining claims made by organizations such as CHOICE, and the Australian Communications Consumer Action Network.”

    CHOICE, which describes itself as “the people’s watchdog,” said in a statement that it welcomed the committee’s probe. The group said the government’s investigation will focus on the price of computers, software, games, and digital music “to force international companies to front up and explain their higher prices in Australia.”
    CHOICE submitted a report to the committee last year, which found that Australians are paying on average 34 percent more for software, 52 percent more for iTunes music, 88 percent more for Wii games and 41 percent more for computer hardware than U.S. consumers.

    “We have recommended that the government investigate whether measures used to sustain international price discrimination, like geo-blocking, are anti-competitive,” CHOICE said.

    On the Apple Australia website, an iPad mini starts at approximately $379, whereas it is $329 in the U.S. The Microsoft Surface RT, meanwhile, starts at $575 in Australia and $499 in the U.S.

    PCMag has reached out to Microsoft, Adobe, and Apple, and will update with any statement they might have.
    This is not the first time Apple has tangled with Australian officials. In June 2012, Apple was fined about $2 million for misleading the public about the new iPad’s capabilities.


  • Apple Is Testing Watch-Like Device

    Apple reportedly is developing a “watch-like device”.

    Want the powers of communication at your wrist, like out of some sci-fi novel? Apple reportedly is developing a “watch-like device” according to the Wall Street Journal, and it may have some of the features of a smartphone.

    Sources say Apple has discussed this kind of a device with Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., also known as Foxconn, and that company is developing technology for Apple and other customers that could be “making displays more power-efficient” and helping chip manufacturers “strip down their products,” the Wall Street Journal reports.
    The report says Apple’s plans for the device are “unclear.”

    The New York Times speculates that the device could have many of the iPhone’s current features, such as Siri or maps, or maybe it could monitor health or make mobile payments.

    What do you think? What would you like to see out of a smartwatch?
    Read More at Wall Street Journal


  • Microsoft Surface Pro model sells out

    Microsoft celebrated “amazing” response to its latest model of the Surface over the weekend,.

    Microsoft celebrated “amazing” response to its latest model of the Surface over the weekend, with the announcement that the tablet’s 128 GB model had sold out online and in stores across the country.

    We’re working with our retail partners who are currently out of stock of the 128GB Surface Pro to replenish supplies as quickly as possible

    -said Surface product chief Panos Panay in a company blog post Saturday.

    The larger model of the Surface sold out almost immediately online, and some stores reported that customers were lined up outside of Microsoft, Best Buy and Staples locations in lines reminiscent of Apple launches. But once customers got to many of those stores, particularly partner retailers, they found that Microsoft had only shipped a handful of the tablets to go on shelves.

    That led to plenty of chatter that Microsoft may have orchestrated a sellout by limiting the number of units it sent out into stores.

    ReadWrite’s Brian Proffitt wrote that this appearance of planned scarcity reminds him of the Apple iPad 2 launch, when the company gave very limited amounts of the tablets to non-Apple stores.

    Of course, Microsoft may have been working to keep itself out of a different supply pickle — putting too many Surface Pros onto shelves and having to suffer the embarrassment of seeing them languish there.

    Microsoft hasn’t released sales data apart from the news that its larger model had sold out, so it will be some time before we can puzzle out whether this was really a representation of roaring demand or a supply problem on Microsoft’s end.

    Reviews of the Surface Pro have been lukewarm, with many folks not quite sure what to make of the device.

    The Surface Pro is generally viewed as a tablet but is probably more fairly compared to laptops. As a tablet it’s a clunky device with bad battery life. As a laptop, it’s a lightweight machine that will run legacy Windows software and works with either of Microsoft’s two models of QWERTY keyboard.

    There haven’t been solid numbers on the device’s tablet sibling, the Surface RT, either, though analysts estimate that Microsoft has moved at least 700,000 units since its October debut.


  • When E-Mail Turns From Delight to Deluge

    IN the not-so-distant past, the chipper AOL sound of “You’ve got mail!” filled me with giddiness and glee.

    IN the not-so-distant past, the chipper AOL sound of “You’ve got mail!” filled me with giddiness and glee. I would eagerly check my in-box, excited to see what message had arrived.

    Those days are long gone. Now, when I examine my various e-mail accounts, my main emotion is dread.

    One morning last week, I sat at my desk and stared at my Gmail in-box; 40,000 unread e-mails stared back. (That big number is a function of my life as a writer, and of having five different accounts, work and personal.) Feeling unusually invigorated, I attacked the mountain, trashing subscription newsletters and social networking alerts en masse. I typed brief confirmations for various meetings, sent long-overdue R.S.V.P.’s and replied to a few friends who had sent warm notes of hello. In an hour, I worked my way through roughly 100 e-mails.

    Satisfied by a morning well spent, I left for an early lunch. But when I returned to my desk an hour later, it was as if I’d never deleted a thing. There were dozens of new messages, each waiting to be tackled.

    Frustrated, I closed my e-mail and couldn’t bring myself to return to it for the rest of the day.

    It wasn’t always like this. E-mail was once a great tool for communication, one that was less intrusive than the telephone and faster than the Postal Service. Now, even when it works as designed, it’s a virtual nightmare — and, occasionally, an actual one. I’ve had many a stress dream about missing important notes from my boss.

    Where have we gone wrong?

    Part of it has to do with how stagnant the format of e-mail has remained, while the rest of communication and social networking has surged light years ahead, says Susan Etlinger, an analyst at the Altimeter Group, who studies how people use and interact with technology and the Internet. E-mail is largely arranged along a linear timeline, with little thought given to context and topic.

    “It’s become another timeline or feed,” she says. “It goes by and then it’s done. The current model of e-mail feels obsolete.”

    She also says that while most e-mail providers are trying to block spammers and phishers from bombarding people, they have barely begun to tackle the problem of social spam — a plague of unnecessary and unwanted e-mail that includes alerts from social networks like LinkedIn, Twitter and Tumblr.

    “The spam problem has mostly been fixed, at least, in terms of what is legitimately supposed to be spam,” she said. “It’s the unwanted e-mails that are so horrifying.”

    These frustrations seem universal. And they are not going away anytime soon, particularly given the news that the post office is planning to drop the delivery of certain mail on Saturdays. Our dependence on e-mail is only growing. Indeed, Pingdom, a Web site that monitors Internet use, published a report in January saying that there are 2.2 billion e-mail users worldwide, and that global e-mail traffic has reached 144 billion messages a day.

    Some preliminary answers to this digital quandary are emerging.

    Google offered its version of a solution with Priority in-box, a feature that tries to automatically identify urgent messages. And Apple recently introduced a “V.I.P.” tag that will push a notification to the user when an e-mail arrives from a previously designated important person. These help, but they are not enough on their own.

    Even using both systems, I still resort to keeping an eye on my in-box through the day and jotting down a list — on paper — of people to write back at the end of the day or before bed. It’s archaic at best, and I rarely get to everyone before the day is out.

    Of course, there is a regimented, minimalist approach to clearing out in-boxes each day — otherwise known as In-Box Zero — but that requires a level of constant attention and maintenance beyond the scope of my time and patience.

    I was starting to consider e-mail bankruptcy — ditching my account and signing up for a new one — until I heard about a new option in the e-mail wars, an iOS app called Mailbox, which promises to change how we manage our mail.

    Mailbox, in a way, harks back to an older, simpler system in which you checked your mail — the paper kind — and sorted it as soon as you received it. You read the most pressing letters first, tossed away the junk and set aside pieces of mail that could be dealt with later. The app does much the same thing, by letting users sort their in-box into three neat columns, in a much sleeker and prettier interface than the basic mail clients available for the iPhone or most Android phones.


  • Automakers hope to rev up sales of diesel vehicles

    Diesel-powered vehicles account for only 3% of U.S. auto sales, but GM, Volkswagen, Mazda and other brands are rolling out new models in a bid to raise that figure.

    Drivers in the U.S. are discovering what Europeans have known for years: Diesel engines are powerful and still get eye-popping fuel economy, especially at highway speeds.

    Automakers are rolling out new diesels in the U.S. market, including a diesel version of General Motors Co.’s Chevrolet Cruze, which debuts Thursday at the Chicago Auto Show.

    Diesels account for just 3% of U.S. auto sales. But automakers see that increasing as they offer more diesel models, part of the effort to meet increasingly stringent federal fuel economy standards.

    GM joins Volkswagen, Audi, Mercedes-Benz and BMW in pitching diesel passenger cars for the U.S. market. This year, Jeep will offer a diesel version of its popular Grand Cherokee sport utility vehicle, and Mazda Motor Corp. will offer a diesel version of the new-generation Mazda6 sedan.

    The automakers are using versions of diesel engines they have already developed for Europe and other markets.

    Diesels now account for about 20% of VW’s sales volume in the U.S. The company welcomes the entrance of new diesel competitors, believing a rising tide will lift all boats.

    “This is not a fixed slice of pie that gets divided by the same customers,” said Jonathan Browning, chief executive of Volkswagen Group of America. “This will grow the diesel segment, and that’s good news for us.”

    Automakers hope to lure more buyers such as Danny Albarran, a Simi Valley resident who drives a diesel Dodge Ram pickup truck. The Los Angeles City Fire Department engineer learned to appreciate diesels after seeing their reliability and efficiency while driving firetrucks.

    “You will see diesel trucks and cars out there regularly get 200,000 to 300,000-plus miles,” said Albarran, who also owns a Toyota Prius. “We rarely have true engine trouble with our firetrucks — none of the issues you see with gasoline engines.”

    Even in everyday vehicles, diesel engines provide more power, better fuel economy, a higher resale value and extra longevity, he said.

    The resale value of a compact car with a diesel engine is about 63% of its sticker price after three years, according to ALG, a consulting firm that estimates used car values for the leasing business. That compares with 53% for a compact car with a gasoline engine.

    But there are drawbacks.

    Consumers pay a premium for that diesel engine — from about $2,000 for a VW hatchback or sedan to more than $5,000 for a luxury car or big truck.

    Although the fuel economy for a diesel can be as much as a third better than for a gasoline car, oil companies charge more for diesel. Depending on what’s happening in the oil industry, the gap has been as much as 50 cents a gallon over regular-grade gasoline in the last year or so. Diesel has been 20 cents to 30 cents higher for much of the last two years, according to the nonprofit Diesel Technology Forum.

    Currently, diesel costs 45 cents, or about 13%, more than regular-grade gasoline, according to the AAA Fuel Gauge Report. About half of all service stations nationwide have at least one diesel fuel pump.

    Part of the gap comes from taxes. Federal taxes on diesel fuel are 6 cents a gallon higher than for gasoline, a result of an agreement with the diesel-dependent trucking industry as a way to make up for the extra wear and tear heavy trucks put on the nation’s roads.

    A growing number of consumers appear willing to accept that extra fuel expense, perhaps inured by the high price of all automotive fuel, said Allen Schaeffer, executive director of Diesel Technology Forum. Sales of diesel vehicles have risen by double digits in 20 of the last 24 months, he said.

    Car buyers “are looking at long-term value,” Schaeffer said.

    Americans have historically shunned diesels. That’s because of historically cheap gasoline, compared with other countries, and because the first diesel passenger cars were noisy, smoky, smelly and slow.

    “Just recently are we seeing that image begin to change,” said Tom Libby, an analyst with automotive research firm R.L. Polk & Co.


  • Flickr accidentally made some private photos public

    An unknown number of users at Yahoo’s photo-sharing site had their photos revealed to the world

    Well, this is no way to celebrate Flickr’s ninth birthday. The Yahoo-owned photo-sharing site is quietly dealing with the fallout from a bug that caused the settings on an unknown number of private photos to become publicly visible between January 18 and February 7. The photos were not included in Flickr’s search engine or outside search engines, Flickr told users, but they would have been visible to a viewer who was browsing an affected photographer’s stream.

    Only a small number of Flickr users were impacted, and we are in the process of directly contacting those individuals

    Flickr vice president Barry Wayn told users in a help forum thread. “This is not a widespread nor an ongoing issue — the software bug has been identified and fixed.”

    The breach may have affected only a small percentage of users, but it’s a blow to Flickr’s credibility considering the company reassures users that “your photos are safe with us,” and “member privacy is very important to us at Flickr.” And yes, some X-rated photos were temporarily made public. “I had a few naughty photos and they are for friends only,” wrote user kathynails1.

    “Flickr has a pretty significant but very carefully hidden huge amateur porn community — just search for ‘milf’ with safe search off for all photos,” photographer and outspoken Flickr critic Thomas Hawk said in an email. “I’d imagine these would be the people most likely affected in a serious way by this.”

    Other users who noticed the bug last week reported that they tried to set their suddenly-public photos back to private, but the settings kept reverting to public.

    Some users, especially those paying for a Flickr Pro account, were upset enough to threaten defection. “Thanks for alerting me to the problem that private photos might get public,” one paid user wrote in the forums. I immediately deleted my private photos — but I wonder if they are really gone or if they turn up again at some point. I consider deleting my whole account [sic].”

    Flickr set “any potentially impacted photos” to private, in an attempt to make things right. However, this has caused additional problems for affected users, who found that their intentionally public photos were now private. Some users reported that they now have to comb through hundreds of photos and manually set them back to public. Setting a photo to private also apparently wipes the description and breaks the code anywhere else the photo is embedded on the web.

    “it has utterly decimated my food blogging site which is a huge source of revenue for me,” paid user MommyNamedApril wrote in the forum. “Not only do I have to go back and change all the permissions, BUT changing the permissions changes the code, which means I have to go through each post and re-apply all my pictures. This is HUNDREDS of pictures. I am utterly disgusted and shaking I am so angry.”


  • Linux Foundation ships UEFI Secure Boot workaround

    The Linux Foundation’s open source workaround for Unified Extensible Firmware Interface.

    The Linux Foundation’s open source workaround for Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) Secure Boot has shipped, and while it’s not necessarily the easiest way to boot Linux on UEFI-enabled PCs, its authors claim it should now work with any bootloader and any distribution.

    The Linux community was first alerted to potential problems with Secure Boot in 2011, when computer boffins warned that the digital signing restrictions in UEFI could lock Linux out of PCs that shipped with Windows installed and the firmware security features enabled.

    With Secure Boot switched on, the UEFI firmware will only boot operating systems that have been digitally signed, which is problematic for free software. In particular, software that is licensed under the GPLv3 – such as the popular Linux bootloader Grub 2 – is explicitly incompatible with Microsoft’s signing scheme.

    For its part, Microsoft argued that OEMs were free to allow users to disable Secure Boot, so long as those who did so understood that they were reducing the overall security of their systems. But Linux enthusiasts observed that some OEMs were actually disabling the Secure Boot switch in their firmwares, leaving customers with no way to turn it off (and thus, no way to boot Linux).

    Linux kernel hackers wasted no time attacking the problem, and a number of potential workarounds were soon mooted. With the official release of the Linux Foundation’s method on Friday, there are now two working techniques for booting Linux on UEFI Secure Boot machines.

    The first is Matthew Garret’s Shim, some variant of which is currently used by Fedora, Suse, Ubuntu, and a number of smaller Linux distros. This method has the advantage of being fairly painless for end users, while allowing small distros to support Secure Boot without dealing directly with Microsoft.

    The new method proposed by the Linux Foundation is slightly more complicated than the Shim method, but it does a better job of supporting the full Secure Boot OS loading API. Specifically, Shim doesn’t support the standard UEFI LoadImage() and StartImage() calls, which means some UEFI-compatible bootloaders won’t work with it.

    The Linux Foundation’s pre-bootloader does support such loaders – including gummiboot and efilinux – but the price is that it makes systems that use it harder to maintain.

    The Linux Foundation’s method is based on cryptographic hashes rather than signing keys, which means that every time the kernel or bootloader for a specific machine is updated, the user must manually add the new hash for that component to the list of permitted binaries. Doing so requires being physically present at the machine, which makes this method unsuitable for servers that are managed remotely.

    Some of this may change in the future, however. Garrett says he is currently working on merging the Linux Foundation’s code with Shim to produce a new loader that can support both approaches – though when such a combined tool might emerge remains up in the air.

    For now, Linux hackers who would like to try out the Linux Foundation’s method can download the code for its loader from maintainer Jim Bottomley’s website. ®


  • Digital Tags Help Ensure the Price Is Right

    Then bar codes and computerized cash registers arrived. In most stores, prices were posted on shelves but not on the items themselves.

    SOME decades ago, a grocery store’s aisles were often filled with “chunk-a-chunk-a” sounds, as clerks stamped prices to the tops of cans and boxes before putting them on shelves. It was a labor-intensive operation, but it did result in a price being affixed to most every item in the store.

    Then bar codes and computerized cash registers arrived. In most stores, prices were posted on shelves but not on the items themselves.

    I’ve always trusted that the system works well — and I’ve tapped my foot impatiently when a shopper ahead of me slowed the checkout process by closely watching the prices that came up, as if the scanner might have recorded the wrong product code. What I hadn’t realized was that there is valid reason to be vigilant. The potential problems originate on the shelves, in the form of the shelf tags, which may or may not match the current price in a store’s computer.

    A typical grocery store puts 5,000 items on sale in a week and removes sale prices from another 5,000. That creates an abundance of opportunities for mismatches when workers print out the new price labels in a back room, then hunt for the proper place on the shelf to attach them.

    This has left store technology in an incomplete state: mostly but not entirely computerized. The next step is to go completely paperless by putting small, battery-powered digital price tags on the shelves. Price changes can then be received wirelessly from the store’s network, ensuring that the price displayed on the shelf and the one called up at the checkout counter are the same.

    Altierre, a digital tag and sensor maker based in San Jose, Calif., has raised more than $80 million from investors and spent 10 years developing the technology for digital tags and the wireless networks they require. It asserts that outfitting a store with 20,000 to 25,000 tags, each costing about $5, would produce labor savings that would pay back the investment in two to two-and-a-half years.

    The tags can provide multiple screens of information. To reduce power consumption, Altierre uses black-on-gray liquid crystal displays, the same type used in digital watches and pocket calculators. The most generous thing that can be said about this type of display is that its legibility is satisfactory.

    At Altierre’s headquarters, a full-size mock grocery store is set up with its tags installed on the shelves. There, I was surprised to find that the LCD’s legibility problems didn’t seem so significant: shoppers stand close to the shelves anyway. On some shelves, Altierre showed off an improved tag, at a higher price, that uses E Ink technology. Its text is noticeably crisper than that of an ordinary LCD tag.

    I asked Sunit Saxena, Altierre’s chief executive, why grocery stores haven’t leapt at the chance to save themselves money by installing the tags. “They’re treading carefully because the fear is, they’ll put 30,000 of these in a store where people are used to seeing paper and it will be a drastic change,” he said. “They worry that their sales will drop.”

    Digital sign technology is hardly new. In France, customers are accustomed to digital signs in grocery stores, where an LCD tag with limited display capacity has been on shelves for about 10 years, says Michel Itié, an I.T. consultant. It shows only the price and the price per weight, so it requires a separate paper tag to show an item’s name.

    Many French hypermarkets, which combine grocery stores and department stores, also use the tags. Mr. Itié is working with a company that is installing Altierre’s technology for the hypermarket chain E.Leclerc, which has installed 300,000 new LCD tags in 10 stores and plans to deploy a total of two million tags by year-end.

    In the United States, grocery stores still cannot justify making the investment in digital price tags, says Patrick C. Fitzpatrick, president of Atlanta Retail Consulting. “If the payback was advantageous, you’d see them everywhere.”

    Stores are eager, however, to find an affordable way to reduce price-related errors. Mr. Fitzpatrick says that when grocery store managers conduct “price integrity audits” and compare price labels on the shelves with the prices in the store computer, paper labels are only 95 percent to 96 percent accurate.