Category: Business

  • Airline offers child-free economy class on some flights

    Tired of rowdy, squawking kids when you fly? Well, one airline is offering a child-free zone, but it will cost you.

    MALAYSIA- Tired of rowdy, squawking kids when you fly? Well, one airline is offering a child-free zone, but it will cost you.

    Air Asia X is now banning kids under 12 from the first seven rows of economy class on flights throughout the Far East and Down Under. The extra charge is between $11 and $35.50 (if you want to pick your exact seat).

    Hannah Walker, mother of two young girls, thinks it’s a good idea, “People with kids always feel really bad when their kids are being loud and other people are trying to have their quiet time or sleep.”

    Erica Joseph, who has never been on a plane with noisy, crying kids, says she wouldn’t support an airline that banned her children from any section. “I wouldn’t because that’s discrimination against children,” she says.

    The “Quiet Zone,” as Air Asia calls it, is sectioned off by toilets and a bulkhead. But let’s be real– if a baby’s screaming, nothing’s gonna block the sound.

    “Well, I think it’s kind of annoying,” says five-year-old Chloe Walker while waiting on her parents to get their luggage at Hobby Airport.

    But Nhung Nguyen, who’s a bit older and wiser, says folks should be a little more sympathetic, “It’s annoying, but you were once a child.”

    “Kids are kids,” says Marcus Freeman who’s against any kid-free zone on planes, “If you don’t have any tolerance for kids, then you probably shouldn’t been riding a plane. You should probably ride the Greyhound.”

    It’s hard to do that over the ocean, but you get his point.

    Stephanie Mumme, mother to two rowdy young boys, has a good point of her own: “I think it would be fair if the kids also had a place in the back, like maybe a little playground or when you pulled down the (table tray), there’d be little games… they could play with. That way they’re also happy.”

    We’re not sure if any airline is considering that, but one thing’s certain– if they do offer it, there will be a new fee attached!


  • 5% of Credit Reports Contain Costly Errors: FTC

    Five percent of U.S. consumers have an error on their credit report that “could lead to them paying more for products such as auto loans and insurance,” the Federal Trade Commission said Monday.

    Five percent of U.S. consumers have an error on their credit report that “could lead to them paying more for products such as auto loans and insurance,” the Federal Trade Commission said Monday, as it issued a long-awaited study of credit report accuracy.

    “These are eye-opening numbers for American consumers,” said Howard Shelanski, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Economics. “The results of this first-of-its-kind study make it clear that consumers should check their credit reports regularly. If they don’t, they are potentially putting their pocketbooks at risk.”

    The trade group for the nation’s credit reporting agencies issued a swift response challenging the agency’s interpretation, saying the study shows credit reports are “highly accurate.”

    “The study also showed that 95 percent of consumers are unaffected by errors in their credit report,” the Consumer Data Industry Association said in a statement.

    The FTC study, eight years in the making, also tracked consumers as they tried to fix or dispute errors in their credit reports. More than one in 10 who did this saw their credit score change as a result.

    The study was ordered by Congress in 2003, when it passed the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act. The FTC followed 1,001 consumers as they tried to navigate the credit report system and to fix mistakes in their reports.

    Among other things, the study found:

    • 26 percent of consumers in the study identified a “potentially material error”;
    • 21 percent managed to obtain a modification of an error;
    • Roughly half of that group experienced a change in credit score;
    • Most of those credit score changes were minor, with roughly half resulting in swings of 20 points or less;
    • The most important finding of all: For 52 of individuals studied, “the resulting increase was such that their credit risk tier decreased,” meaning they were likely to get cheaper loan rates.

    Consumer groups responding to the study said it indicates a need for reform of the credit reporting industry.

    “It’s unconscionable that 40 million American have errors in their credit reports, and that 10 million have errors grave enough to cause them to be denied or charged more for credit or insurance or even be denied a job,” said Chi Chi Wu, staff attorney at the National Consumer Law Center.

    Studies of credit report errors have been conducted before, but they have produced confusing results. Many errors are not material — a misspelled street name for example. And errors are not the real problem — lower credit scores that cost consumers when they try to get loans are. Credit bureaus are required by law to quickly fix mistakes, but there have long been allegations that the dispute process is difficult and stacked against consumers. The FTC report attempts to address that, too.

    Of the 262 consumers in the study who disputed information they said was inaccurate:

    • 37 percent said all their concerns were addressed;
    • 42 percent said their report had been modified, but there were still errors on their report;
    • 21 percent said they were unsuccessful in getting their reports modified.

    The report did not attempt to establish the veracity of the consumers’ disputes.

    Credit expert John Ulzheimer, who helped develop the credit score and is now president of Consumer Education at SmartCredit.com, said he felt both the FTC and the credit industry trade group were “embellishing” their claims about the results of the study, but he, too, found the FTC data troubling.

    “I’d side with the FTC that the results are more disturbing than they are confirming credit files are accurate,” he said. He suggested taking the dispute results with “a grain of salt” because the errors claimed by consumers were not independently confirmed.

    FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz told CBS News, which first reported the study’s findings on “60 Minutes,” that the results were “highly troubling. … It’s a pretty high error rate.”

    The credit industry began fighting back even before the “60 Minutes” segment aired. It issued a press release Sunday afternoon, and several employees of Experian spent the evening sending tweets to Twitter users who attacked the industry.

    “It’s easy to selectively hype snippets from the FTC study to sensationalize the issue,” Stuart Pratt, consumer data industry spokesman, said in the release. “But the number important to consumers is the one they ignored – that only 2.2 percent of credit reports contain material errors.”

    The industry and FTC numbers differ because they describe slightly different things: The FTC says 5 percent of consumers are impacted by a serious credit report error, while the industry derives its 2.2 percent figure from the fact that consumers have three different major credit reports, and often errors appear on only one or two of those.

    The industry also disagrees that errors are hard to fix.

    “The notion that it is difficult to dispute an error is just wrong. It is irresponsible to suggest to consumers that they might as well not take action when they have a question about their credit report,” Pratt said.

    Experian public relations officials repeatedly sent out this message last night: “If you ever spot an error on your credit report, please report here http://t.co/5nncPpfPAvg dispute time is 14 days.”

    It also sent users to the Experian website to read about the firm’s policies

    “Experian’s Commitment to Data Integrity, Customer Service and Consumer Education http://t.co/kejlxpQYvia @ExperianNews”

    Some Twitter users complained about Tweet campaign:

    “@Experian_US so (you are) responding (to) tweets from US but resolving life changing disputes from Chile and India!Priorities please!!!” wrote @elizabethforma.

    As the Red Tape Chronicles and other outlets have reported, consumers disputes are often sent overseas for consideration, and workers in places like India and Chile only have a few moments to consider each dispute.

    An Experian official who was sending out Tweets would not agree to be interviewed by NBC News; she directed questions to Pratt at the industry group.


  • Nasdaq talked with Carlyle about going private

    Nasdaq OMX Group recently talked with private equity firm Carlyle Group about taking the trans-Atlantic exchange operator private.

    Carlyle initiated the discussions and was in early stages of due diligence when differences emerged, bringing the talks to an end, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Monday.

    Management at Nasdaq feels that the company is undervalued compared with its peers, two separate sources said. Nasdaq’s board has a fiduciary responsibility to consider all offers.

    All of the sources asked not to be identified because they are not authorized to speak publicly on the matter.

    The talks, first reported by Fox Business Network, occurred about three weeks ago.

    Nasdaq spokesman Joseph Christinat said the company does not comment on market rumors or speculation. A spokesman for Carlyle declined to comment.

    The talks came just weeks after Nasdaq rival NYSE Euronext (NYX.N) said it was being bought by IntercontinentalExchange Inc (ICE.N) in a cash and stock deal valued at $8.2 billion when it was announced in December.

    Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway in November also bid for the Big Board parent. The Berkshire offer fell short, but it highlighted the interest in the sector.

    Of the four private equity firms that trade publicly, Carlyle is the only one listed on the Nasdaq. KKR & Co LP (KKR.N), Apollo Global Management LLC (APO.N) and Blackstone Group LP (BX.N) are listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

    Carlyle Chief Financial Officer Adena Friedman joined Nasdaq in early 2011. Prior to that, she had been at Nasdaq since 1993, where she held several posts, including CFO. When she did so, market players immediately speculated that Carlyle would go public on the Nasdaq, which it did in May of last year.

    Shares of Nasdaq were up 3.5 percent at $30.49 on Monday afternoon. (Reporting By John McCrank and Greg Roumeliotis; Additional reporting by Paritosh Bansal; Editing by Steve Orlofsky)


  • Complex Investments Prove Risky

    Regulators across the country are confronting a wave of investor fraud that is saddling retirement savers with steep losses on complex products.

    Regulators across the country are confronting a wave of investor fraud that is saddling retirement savers with steep losses on complex products that until a few years ago were pitched only to the most sophisticated investors.

    The victims are among the millions of Americans whose mutual funds and stock portfolios plummeted in the wake of the financial crisis, and who started searching for ways to make better returns than those being offered by bank deposits and government bonds with minuscule interest rates.

    Tens of thousands of them put money into speculative bets promoted by aggressive financial advisers. The investments include private loans to young companies like television production firms and shares in bundles of commercial real estate properties.

    Those alternative investments have now had time to go sour in big numbers, state and federal securities regulators say, and are making up a majority of complaints and prosecutions.

    “Since the crisis, we’ve seen more and more people reaching out into different types of exotic investments that are a big concern to us,” said William F. Galvin, the Massachusetts secretary of the commonwealth.

    Last Wednesday, Mr. Galvin’s office ordered one of the nation’s largest brokerage firms, LPL Financial, to pay $2.5 million for improperly selling the real estate bundles, known as nontraded REITs, or real estate investment trusts, to hundreds of state residents from 2006 to 2009, in some cases overloading clients’ accounts with them.

    LPL said it agreed, as part of the settlement, to reform its process for selling such alternative investments.

    There are few good statistics on the extent of the problem nationally. But cases are mounting in the offices of regulators like A. Heath Abshure, the securities commissioner in Arkansas, where a majority of the 66 open securities cases involve complex investments sold to less sophisticated investors looking for a steady return.

    J. Bradley Bennett, chief of enforcement at the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or Finra, Wall Street’s self-regulatory group, said that for the last two years, 10 staff members have looked at the “proliferation of these products, to understand how they are being sold.”

    “It’s got our attention,” he said. “We recognize the trends.”

    Brokers promoting bad investments to unsophisticated investors is nothing new. But while the easy prey used to be people looking to get rich quick, the pool has widened to include savers looking for ways to earn the kind of income once reliably available from traditional investments.

    Regulators are warning investors that the dangers are unlikely to recede, given the Federal Reserve’s pledge to keep interest rates near zero and the push among financial firms to earn more revenue from so-called alternative investments marketed to retail investors. Brokers are eager to sell these investments because they often bring in higher commissions than standard mutual funds and stocks.

    The money that retail investors have in alternative investments in the United States, ranging from baskets of commodities to mutual funds that employ sophisticated trading, more than doubled from 2008 to 2012, to $712 billion from $312 billion, according to McKinsey & Company. Many of the products hold out the promise of higher returns while ostensibly being immune to the volatility of stock markets.

    The phenomenon of investors’ actively moving money in pursuit of higher interest rates, known as chasing yield, is reverberating through the economy. Jeremy C. Stein, a Federal Reserve governor, said in a speech on Thursday that he worried that investors desperate for yield could be creating a bubble in widely available investments like junk bonds.

    Mary Beck, a furniture business consultant in Pasadena, Calif., said that in 2008, as the stock investments in her husband’s I.R.A. began to fall quickly, the couple moved $470,000 to a new product recommended by their broker.

    While the offering was unfamiliar — part ownership in a fleet of luxury cars — Ms. Beck bought the pitch because her broker had been around for years, and the product offered what seemed to be a modest annual interest rate of 7 percent.

    “We knew that 12 percent wasn’t realistic, but 7 percent seemed realistic,” Ms. Beck said. “To us, it was a very conservative way to ensure that we’d increase our savings.”

    Soon after they stopped receiving interest payments, the Becks lost their money when the venture went bankrupt in 2012. Ms. Beck and her husband have been reconfiguring their retirement and are planning to work longer.


  • Barclays to cut 3,700 jobs

    Tarnished by its role in a global interest-rate-rigging scandal, the British investment bank Barclays is trying to regain the public’s trust.

    Tarnished by its role in a global interest-rate-rigging scandal, the British investment bank Barclays is trying to regain the public’s trust.

    Antony Jenkins, who took over as Barclays’ chief executive last year after the scandal forced out the bank’s top leadership, declared Tuesday: “There will be no going back to the old way of doing things.”

    Jenkins, in a speech, added: “We never want to be in a position again of rewarding people for activity that is inconsistent with our values.”

    Barclays on Tuesday announced that it would lay off at least 3,700 employees this year as part of a broad restructuring. The bank said it lost $1.6 billion in all of 2012, compared to a $4.7-billion profit in 2011.

    Since Barclays agreed last year to pay $450 million to settle U.S. and British investigations into allegations that it, along with banks, colluded to manipulate the benchmark London Inter-Bank Offered Rate, or Libor, Jenkins has sought to regain trust from the public and investors.

    On Tuesday, he offered a critique of the banking industry’s recklessness.

    “The behaviors which made headlines during the year stemmed from a period of 20 years in banking in which the sector became too aggressive, too focused on the short term, and too disconnected from the needs of customers and clients, and wider society,” he said in a statement. “Barclays was not immune from the impact of these trends, and we suffered reputational damage in 2012 as a consequence.”



  • The median sales price rose from a year earlier in 133 of 152 metropolitan areas measured

    -the National Association of Realtors said in a report today. (more…)